On September 19, 2012 15:27:43 Dmitry Makovey wrote: > On September 19, 2012 15:20:17 Dmitry Makovey wrote: > > > Daniel, you saved my day - I thought that something like that should > > exist > > but I completely ommited sepgsql* set as I was under impression that it > > applied to a completely different functionality. I'll use that instead of > > my module. Thank you very much. > > > > spoke too soon: > > # setsebool sepgsql_enable_pitr_implementation On > Could not change active booleans: Invalid boolean > > so it sounds like it doesn't exist in RHEL? yet? ok as per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858406 , Miroslav just added it, so it definitely doesn't exist yet. But it sounds like it is on it's way.. thank you Dan and Dominick for the help. I'll stick with my module for now. What's the best way of tracking whether above changes made it into RHEL6 policies? Just the changelog? -- Dmitry Makovey Web Systems Administrator Athabasca University (780) 675-6245 --- Confidence is what you have before you understand the problem Woody Allen When in trouble when in doubt run in circles scream and shout http://www.wordwizard.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=19330 -- This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal, and or privileged information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action relying on it. Any communications received in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed. --- -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
