Re: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812100

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/20/2012 04:42 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Dear folks,

The title has been reported as NOT A BUG, but it is annoying :(
without doing anything but logging in, the setroubleshooter kicks in and displays the message.  I have tried numerous times to report it, but it came back empty.  Then I click enough times and see that it is there, but it is NOT A BUG :(, I don't agree but can't do shite.

--- Running report_Bugzilla ---
Logging into Bugzilla at https://bugzilla.redhat.com
Checking for duplicates
Bug is already reported: 812100
Logging out
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812100

--- Running report_Bugzilla ---
This problem was already reported to Bugzilla (see 'https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812100'). Do you still want to create a new bug? NO


SELinux is preventing dmesg from 'read' accesses on the file /etc/ld.so.cache.

*****  Plugin restorecon (94.8 confidence) suggests  *************************

If you want to fix the label.
/etc/ld.so.cache default label should be ld_so_cache_t.
Then you can run restorecon.
Do
# /sbin/restorecon -v /etc/ld.so.cache

*****  Plugin catchall_labels (5.21 confidence) suggests  ********************

If you want to allow dmesg to have read access on the ld.so.cache file
Then you need to change the label on /etc/ld.so.cache
Do
# semanage fcontext -a -t FILE_TYPE '/etc/ld.so.cache'
where FILE_TYPE is one of the following: cpu_online_t, afs_cache_t, abrt_helper_exec_t, textrel_shlib_t, rpm_script_tmp_t, user_cron_spool_t, puppet_tmp_t, ld_so_cache_t, abrt_var_run_t, udev_var_run_t, sysctl_kernel_t, abrt_var_run_t, sysctl_crypto_t, locale_t, dmesg_t, proc_t, sysfs_t, dmesg_exec_t, abrt_t, lib_t, ld_so_t.
Then execute:
restorecon -v '/etc/ld.so.cache'


*****  Plugin catchall (1.44 confidence) suggests  ***************************

If you believe that dmesg should be allowed read access on the ld.so.cache file by default.
Then you should report this as a bug.
You can generate a local policy module to allow this access.
Do
allow this access for now by executing:
# grep dmesg /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol
# semodule -i mypol.pp

Additional Information:
Source Context                system_u:system_r:dmesg_t:s0
Target Context                unconfined_u:object_r:etc_t:s0
Target Objects                /etc/ld.so.cache [ file ]
Source                        dmesg
Source Path                   dmesg
Port<Unknown>
Host                          (removed)
Source RPM Packages
Target RPM Packages           glibc-2.15-32.fc17.i686
Policy RPM                    selinux-policy-3.10.0-116.fc17.noarch
Selinux Enabled               True
Policy Type                   targeted
Enforcing Mode                Enforcing
Host Name                     (removed)
Platform                      Linux acer-aspire-1 3.3.2-1.fc17.i686 #1 SMP Fri
                               Apr 13 21:06:40 UTC 2012 i686 i686
Alert Count                   1
First Seen                    Thu 19 Apr 2012 09:30:20 PM CDT
Last Seen                     Thu 19 Apr 2012 09:30:20 PM CDT
Local ID                      db50d35a-1a8c-4e53-a4ae-98765dcb81db

Raw Audit Messages
type=AVC msg=audit(1334889020.147:6): avc:  denied  { read } for  pid=633 comm="dmesg" name="ld.so.cache" dev="dm-1" ino=54745 scontext=system_u:system_r:dmesg_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:etc_t:s0 tclass=file


Hash: dmesg,dmesg_t,etc_t,file,read

audit2allowunable to open /sys/fs/selinux/policy:  Permission denied


audit2allow -Runable to open /sys/fs/selinux/policy:  Permission denied



What do I do, please advice.  I am getting annoyed, frustrated and I would hate to kill off selinux, because I actually like it, but the NOT A BUG does bother me.  I have had the past three or four days dealing with this, and now I am finally doing something about it :(

Thanks for listening.

Regards,


Antonio
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
I have just reopened the bug.
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux