> My bet is that it is related to how you apply your patches. This can't be the cause in itself. When I build exactly the same policy, but "activated" these modules (i.e. instead of "off" place " module" instead - i.e. no real change made) everything passes with no errors. This is also how I used to build my previous versions of the same policy (FC13) - no problems there either. > Also i > would, like i said before, just remove any reference to modules that you > do not want installed from modules-targeted.conf. > It makes no difference - I already tried that. > The Error message does not ring any bells for me either. > Ah, well. I'll dig in to see if I can find what is causing this. I suspect it may be something to do with the user role "modules" I switched off - dbadm, webadm, staff, unprivuser, guest and xguest. Although I do not need any of these (and neither do any of the modules I compiled - as far as I know), there are quite a few other *-targeted.* files in the source directory I haven't looked at. There might be something in them, which causes this, so I'll probably check that. This is the only potential reason for this error. I am speculating here, because I truly don't know what on Earth does "invalid module in module package (at section 0)" mean? Do you get the same error when you try to build the policy with "rpmbuild -bb" after applying my patches? -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
