-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/05/2010 09:29 PM, Mr Dash Four wrote: > >> looks like a bug in policy (redhat.bugzilla.com in the selinux-policy >> component) >> > Looks like it, though I've gone further with this today... > >> but before you consider that verify that there is no boolean available >> that you can toggle to provide this access: >> >> sesearch --allow -SC -s local_login_t -t openct_var_run_t >> >> If there is a line that allows local_login_t openct_var_run_t:file read >> then see if the line is prefixed with DT or ET (disabled tunable, >> enabled tunable respectively) >> > There is nothing - I actually looked at locallogin.te/if before posting > this, executing the above (and seeing nothing) just reaffirmed what I > already knew. > >> But chances are youve just stumbled upon a bug or you've misconfigured >> something. >> > OK, I played a bit of a mischief. I did not wait for an answer to this > and looked at openct.if to see if there is something which might help me. > > The idea was that if I find something I will then create a custom module > implementing it (that does not cure the bug though - if it is a bug it > needs to be fixed). So I found this in openct.if - > "openct_read_pid_files" which looked like it grants the necessary > permissions to the specified domain (local_login_t) and prepared a > custom module executing "openct_read_pid_files(local_login_t)". That > worked on the test harness, but failed to produce the desired result on > my other, non-test machine for which I was building this. I am getting 2 > further AVC types below: > > type=AVC msg=audit(1291573359.027:5): avc: denied { signull } for > pid=1553 comm="login" > scontext=system_u:system_r:local_login_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 > tcontext=system_u:system_r:openct_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=process > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1291573359.027:5): arch=40000003 syscall=37 > success=no exit=-13 a0=624 a1=0 a2=2ad788 a3=0 items=0 ppid=1 pid=1553 > auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 > tty=tty1 ses=4294967295 comm="login" exe="/bin/login" > subj=system_u:system_r:local_login_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null) > type=AVC msg=audit(1291573359.046:6): avc: denied { write } for > pid=1553 comm="login" name="0" dev=dm-0 ino=8250 > scontext=system_u:system_r:local_login_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 > tcontext=system_u:object_r:openct_var_run_t:s0 tclass=sock_file > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1291573359.046:6): arch=40000003 syscall=102 > success=no exit=-13 a0=3 a1=bf853ab0 a2=2ad788 a3=89e11e0 items=0 ppid=1 > pid=1553 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 > fsgid=0 tty=tty1 ses=4294967295 comm="login" exe="/bin/login" > subj=system_u:system_r:local_login_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null) > > When I do echo 0 > /selinux/enforce and try again I am getting a 3rd AVC > in addition to the ones above: > > type=AVC msg=audit(1291574143.421:66): avc: denied { signull } for > pid=1580 comm="login" > scontext=system_u:system_r:local_login_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 > tcontext=system_u:system_r:openct_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=process > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1291574143.421:66): arch=40000003 syscall=37 > success=yes exit=0 a0=65e a1=0 a2=d97788 a3=0 items=0 ppid=1 pid=1580 > auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 > tty=tty1 ses=4294967295 comm="login" exe="/bin/login" > subj=system_u:system_r:local_login_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null) > type=AVC msg=audit(1291574143.430:67): avc: denied { write } for > pid=1580 comm="login" name="0" dev=dm-0 ino=8250 > scontext=system_u:system_r:local_login_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 > tcontext=system_u:object_r:openct_var_run_t:s0 tclass=sock_file > type=AVC msg=audit(1291574143.430:67): avc: denied { connectto } for > pid=1580 comm="login" path="/var/run/openct/0" > scontext=system_u:system_r:local_login_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 > tcontext=system_u:system_r:openct_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 > tclass=unix_stream_socket > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1291574143.430:67): arch=40000003 syscall=102 > success=yes exit=0 a0=3 a1=bfe9fbb0 a2=d97788 a3=92b51e0 items=0 ppid=1 > pid=1580 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 > fsgid=0 tty=tty1 ses=4294967295 comm="login" exe="/bin/login" > subj=system_u:system_r:local_login_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null) > > That stems from the fact that openct opens a socket in /var/run/openct > (the socket is called '0' for the first available 'slot' with a token on > my smartcard device or has a different number - 1,2,3... if there is a > specific token number which needs to be used) and uses it to retrieve > the login token for me to login with. > > So, what I'll do (probably tomorrow when I have the time) is see if > there is something else in openct.if which helps with the above problem. > In any case I will submit this as a bug though as it needs to be > incorporated - at least as a boolean - in the standard policy. Smartcard > tokens will be used for login, they may not be widely used now, but that > would definitely change in the near future. > add these two: openct_stream_connect(local_login_t) # assuming it may also want to stream connect to openct, in either case this is the only existing interface that allows access to write openct_var_run_t pid sock files. openct_signull(local_login_t) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkz795AACgkQMlxVo39jgT9fKwCeN9Gs4x1erWtefOYstXQexjIc rnEAnAoChnglw+JCJOFHkMVs6thR49eV =kETq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux