On 08/21/2010 01:23 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 08/19/2010 04:48 PM, David P. Quigley wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 13:38 -0700, Tom London wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Christoph A. <casmls@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I just noticed that I have over 100 processes running in the >>>> sandbox_web_client_t domain, although I closed all my sandbox windows. >>>> >>>> ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c /usr/libexec/gvfsd >>>> 52 >>>> >>>> ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c '/bin/dbus-daemon --fork >>>> --print-pid 5 --print-address 7 --session' >>>> 51 >>>> >>>> Shouldn't they be killed after I closed all sandbox windows? >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Christoph >>>> >>>> >>> I see this too. >>> >>> Could pulseaudio not be shutting down gracefully? Just a guess.... >>> >>> tom > >> I don't believe this has anything to do with the sandbox. I am getting >> similar problems at home on F13 when I use xming to do x forwarding >> between my Windows and Linux machines. I was using it on virt-manager on >> that machine and was still having the problems. > >> Dave > >> -- >> selinux mailing list >> selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux > > > > I wish there was a way to setup a different cgroup for each sandbox. > then we could do a killall on the cgroup. I am not sure but could cgexec (man cgexec) help here? That is how initrc puts services in a defined cgroup. -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
