-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/27/2010 02:38 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Daniel wrote: >> On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> Daniel wrote: >>>> On 05/27/2010 12:00 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>>> Daniel wrote: >>>>>> On 05/27/2010 11:49 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>>>>> Updating a system from CentOS 5.4 (current) to 5.5, and I see: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> libsepol.scope_copy_callback: zosremote: Duplicate declaration in >>>>>>> module: >>>>>>> type/attribute zos_remote_t >>>>>>> libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed >>>>>>> semodule: Failed! >>> <snip> >>>>>> Do you have multiple pp files definitin zosremote? >>> <snip> >>>> locate -r zos.*remote >>>> >>>> Might find the bad pp file. > <snip> >>> I don't believe they want me to remove it. Doing the locate, I find: >>>> locate -r zos.*remote | grep .pp >>> /etc/selinux/mls/modules/active/modules/zosremote.pp >>> /etc/selinux/mls/modules/previous/modules/zosremote.pp >>> /etc/selinux/targeted/modules/active/modules/zos_remote.pp >>> /etc/selinux/targeted/modules/previous/modules/zos_remote.pp >>> /old/etc/selinux/targeted/modules/active/modules/zos_remote.pp >>> /old/etc/selinux/targeted/modules/previous/modules/zos_remote.pp >>> /old/usr/share/selinux/mls/audispd-zos-remote.pp >>> /old/usr/share/selinux/strict/audispd-zos-remote.pp >>> /old/usr/share/selinux/targeted/audispd-zos-remote.pp >>> /usr/share/selinux/mls/zosremote.pp >>> /usr/share/selinux/targeted/zosremote.pp >>> >>> So, which should I get rid of, that was not cleaned up during the >>> update? >> >> Remove all audispd-zos-remote.pp and zos_remote.pp >> >> We ship zosremote.pp > > Ok... I can do that, but are you saying to just rm it, and not whatever > package it came in? > > And if it's not correct, why is it here, anyway? Anyone on the CentOS > list? I don't want to screw around with this as "oh, it's only his weird > problem", I figure that it's happening to a lot of other folks, and I'd > like to make the problem go away for everyone. That, of course, means it > the incorrect stuff needs to be removed from whatever package it's in.... > > mark > > -- > selinux mailing list > selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux > > I think you will find that it does not happen for everyone else and that these files do not belong to other packages. I have a feeling that something went wrong on an update that left these files around. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkv+xjsACgkQrlYvE4MpobN2TQCfTzVW/cJTiLnIXE6o6qZcYkHm ApAAoNvzVidxxudbFMDhQfrrfLdZV0QU =+pxM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
