On 03/08/2010 09:10 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 08/03/10 14:03, Temlakos wrote: > >> Why is it that when I changed some SELinux variables to allow certain >> processes, the allowances did not persist with the next shutdown and >> reboot cycle? >> >> I had occasion to set allow_execmod and several Samba-related Booleans. >> And then this morning, it was as if I hadn't customized anything. >> >> I had to revert and reset every one of those custom variables, and >> /then/ I did a complete relabel. Once I did that, a certain application >> that needed execmod allowed, would run. Samba runs as well, though I >> probably discovered another issue--failure to turn on the nmb service as >> well as the smb service. >> >> But when I change a part of the Samba policy, I thought that should hold >> for good. Why doesn't it? Or did the relabeling finally make the issue >> go away? >> >> I just don't want that issue to come back, that's all--but I don't want >> to disable SELinux in order to do that. >> > You did use the "-P" option to setsebool, didn't you? > > Paul. > -- > selinux mailing list > selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux > > I was using the GUI manager for SELinux, not Konsole. I did not know about option -P. Is this another example of how the GUIs aren't up to par? Temlakos -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
