On Tuesday 17 November 2009 09:00:47 Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 11/17/2009 08:06 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533427 was first reported 6 > > November and on 6 November you reported that the problem was fixed in > > selinux- policy-3.6.32-42.fc12.noarch > > > > WHERE IS selinux-policy-3.6.32-42.fc12.noarch ???? > > > > Today is 17 November. This update (or a later/more-recent version) has > > not appeared in either updates or updates-testing for F12. > > > > This impacts the abrt package's ability to report meaningful bugs! > > > > Gene > > -46 should be in updates-testing. > > When F12 is about to ship packages do not flow as quickly. > Quickly?? Ten days to get a package pushed?? I just checked updates-testing and there is nothing. Since the mirror might not have picked up an update yet, I also checked download.fedora.redhat.com and there are no selinux-* packages in update or update-testing. Currently, there are 38 CC users on BZ 533427 which indicates to me that a number of us "leading edgers" have gotten this problem. Yes, I could go around the standard way of updating to get the fix but why should I need to do that? I am a big fan of SELinux and do not want to disable it or even to put it into permissive mode. However, SELinux is getting in the way of abrt functioning. Usually, I find that SELinux fixes are distributed in a very timely manner. Something is broken here. Gene -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
