Re: squid denial on F11 for var_run_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/16/2009 08:57 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 08:49 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 06/16/2009 08:32 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Unconfined processes tend to stay unconfined.  That is what uses expect,
telling them that they are executing an uconfined process that suddenly
becomes confined, seems wrong to them.  That being said, you can end up
with mislabeled files because of this.

So


unconfined_t ->  squid_exec_t ->  unconfined_t

But unconfined processes starting init scripts have a transition

unconfined_t ->  initrc_exec_t ->  initrc_t ->  squid_exec_t ->  squid_t

So any time you are using a confined process you should use the init
script to start them, otherwise you could get mislabeled files.


I also just wrote a blog on this.

http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/29041.html

Hmm...when did this change?  It used to be the case that a domain
transition was also defined directly from unconfined_t to the daemon
domain when running the daemon binary, precisely because users and
scriptlets sometimes do that.

About FC5 time frame.  The most common error caused by this was

AVC's about getattr in homedir, redirection of stdout blowing up because squid_t can not write to user_tmp_t. Etc.

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux