Re: semodule

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 11:09 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 08:09 -0700, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
> > --- On Fri, 6/5/09, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Found this thread:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg15640.html
> > > 
> > > Can you configure winbind with use default domain=yes?
> > > 
> > 
> > I do have have such setup. Both type of users are affected: local and "winbind"
> 
> Can you append "debug" to the arguments to the latter instance of
> pam_selinux.so, e.g.:
> session    required     pam_selinux.so open env_params debug
> 
> And then login again via ssh and look in /var/log/secure?

Hmmm...btw, I notice that order of entries has changed in /etc/pam.d in
F11 from F10, with the:
session	include	system-auth
line at the end of /etc/pam.d/sshd rather than between the two
pam_selinux instances.

So maybe the problem is that when you upgraded, it didn't replace your
pam config due to your local configuration of winbind, and thus you
didn't get that ordering change.

I know that they reworked the way sshd interacts with pam_selinux.

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux