Re: implications of httpd_unified

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:33:08 +1000
Scott Radvan <sradvan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> 
> I have taken ownership of development on the Fedora 11 SELinux
> (Managing Confined Services) guide, and am currently trying to build
> on the descriptions of the purposes, uses and implications of
> enabling/disabling some of the available Booleans.
> 
> I am wondering if anybody can expand or has any comments on this
> description of the httpd_unified Boolean, as there doesn't seem to be
> a great deal out there about it.
> 
> "This Boolean is off by default, turning it on will allow all httpd
> executables to have full access to all content labeled with a http
> file context. Leaving it off makes sure that one httpd service can not
> interfere with another."
> 
> Specifically I am interested in what is meant by a service that can
> not "interfere with another" in the case of http_unified, but any
> comments which may help me refine the description are more than
> welcome.

I think this means that say httpd_bugzilla_script_t can't access
httpd_sys_* files and httpd_sys_script_t can't access httpd_bugzilla_*
files etc.

Paul.

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux