Re: Rebooted, permissive, setroubleshooter going nuts.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul Howarth wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 05 March 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;

And a portion of this lists archive on this box has gone missing to
boot.
So I can't look up the command to extract all these hits, about once
every
2 minutes or so, to a logfile I can post.  And when I click on the
star,
it tells me the connection has been lost to
/var/run/setroubleshoot/setroubleshoot_server.  But there is a zero
length
file there, generated when I rebooted to 2.6.29-rc7 5:18 ago WTH?

And I just found a very short setroubleshooter.log which I will
attach. It
looks like it got a tummy ache just a few minutes ago.

I think I will follow what I did with 29-rc7, and not build any sound
modules for anything except the audigy2, cuz now I have sound, akonadi
even starts!

Help?
No comment.  Can anyone tell me why, when looking at the log
messages, and
it tells me to get the full report by running sealert with -l
hashnumber, I
as root am denied?  From a root shell:
[root@coyote log]# sealert -l 1ed4cefd-aa3b-4727-b9ef-28b8e2cbb42c
failed to connect to server: Connection refused

I am back on a 2.6.28.7 kernel now. And setroubleshooter's screen
alerts in
time with the kmail pongs of new mail coming are contributing to my
loss of
sanity or whatever.  Somehow it has decided that fetchmail isn't
supposed to
be able to access its users directory/.f,  uhh, I was gonna run it
and get
the exact file and the connection to its server has been lost, again.  I
thought it was funny that the reject messages were going into the system
log...

Uptodate Fedora 10. x86_64 running 32 bit.

A 'service setroubleshoot restart' restarts it though.  Anybody have
a clue,
I seem to be fresh out, and I'm about to compile it out.
Ok, the restart allowed me to collect the most recent hit from sealert:
===============================
[root@coyote init.d]# sealert -l
2ada4c61-64cb-40d7-8268-83488b12426e
Summary:

SELinux is preventing procmail (procmail_t) "append" to
/var/log/fetchmail.log
(var_log_t).
Detailed Description:

[SELinux is in permissive mode, the operation would have been denied
but was
permitted due to permissive
mode.] SELinux is preventing procmail (procmail_t) "append" to
/var/log/fetchmail.log
(var_log_t). The SELinux type var_log_t, is a generic type for all
files in the
directory and very few processes (SELinux Domains) are allowed to
write to this
SELinux type. This type of denial usual indicates a mislabeled file.
By default
a file created in a directory has the gets the context of the parent
directory,
but SELinux policy has rules about the creation of directories, that
say if a  process running in one SELinux Domain (D1) creates a file in
a directory with a
particular SELinux File Context (F1) the file gets a different File
Context    (F2). The policy usually allows the SELinux Domain (D1) the
ability to write,  unlink, and append on (F2). But if for some reason
a file                      (/var/log/fetchmail.log) was created with
the wrong context, this domain will be
denied. The usual solution to this problem is to reset the file
context on the  target file, restorecon -v '/var/log/fetchmail.log'.
If the file context does   not change from var_log_t, then this is
probably a bug in policy. Please file a bug report
(http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi) against the selinux-policy package. If it does change, you can try your
application again to
see if it works. The file context could have been mislabeled by
editing the file
or moving the file from a different directory, if the file keeps
getting        mislabeled, check the init scripts to see if they are
doing something to        mislabel the
file. Allowing Access:

You can attempt to fix file context by executing restorecon -v
'/var/log/fetchmail.log' Fix Command:

restorecon '/var/log/fetchmail.log'

Additional Information:

Source Context                system_u:system_r:procmail_t:s0
Target Context                system_u:object_r:var_log_t:s0
Target Objects                /var/log/fetchmail.log [ file ]
Source                        procmail
Source Path                   /usr/bin/procmail
Port                          <Unknown>
Host                          coyote.coyote.den
Source RPM Packages           procmail-3.22-22.fc10
Target RPM Packages
Policy RPM                    selinux-policy-3.5.13-46.fc10
Selinux Enabled               True
Policy Type                   targeted
MLS Enabled                   True
Enforcing Mode                Permissive
Plugin Name                   mislabeled_file
Host Name                     coyote.coyote.den
Platform                      Linux coyote.coyote.den 2.6.28.7 #6 SMP
PREEMPT
                              Wed Mar 4 23:08:30 EST 2009 i686 athlon
Alert Count                   63
First Seen                    Sat Feb 28 16:34:21 2009
Last Seen                     Thu Mar  5 02:20:43 2009
Local ID                      2ada4c61-64cb-40d7-8268-83488b12426e
Line Numbers

Raw Audit Messages

node=coyote.coyote.den type=AVC msg=audit(1236237643.658:745): avc: denied { append } for pid=8712 comm="procmail"
path="/var/log/fetchmail.log" dev=sda3 ino=23527557
scontext=system_u:system_r:procmail_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_log_t:s0 tclass=file

node=coyote.coyote.den type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1236237643.658:745):
arch=40000003 syscall=11 success=yes exit=0 a0=8941670 a1=8941748
a2=8940af8 a3=0 items=0 ppid=2784 pid=8712 auid=4294967295 uid=501
gid=501 euid=501 suid=501 fsuid=501 egid=501 sgid=501 fsgid=501
tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="procmail" exe="/usr/bin/procmail"
subj=system_u:system_r:procmail_t:s0 key=(null)

Thanks Guys.
Is this a fetchmail log or a procmail log? What do you expect to get
logged here?

I guess you're running fetchmail in daemon mode with procmail as local
delivery agent?

See if this helps:

# semanage fcontext -a -t procmail_log_t '/var/log/fetchmail\.log'
# restorecon -v /var/log/fetchmail.log

Paul.



--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

Currently f10 policy has

./policy/modules/services/mta.te:logging_append_all_logs(system_mail_t)
./policy/modules/system/init.te:logging_append_all_logs(initrc_t)
./policy/modules/system/init.te:logging_append_all_logs(daemon)

I think it could be argued that we should allow all confined domains to
append to any log file, since simple redirection of stdout causes the
AVC in question.  Being able to write to a log file allows a cracked
program to erase the log contents.  Being able to append to a log file
means you could fill up the system with garbage or write something to a
log file that would cause some other app  or Human to do something bad.

Fetchmail policy does not allow for the creation of a logfile right now.
  I guess the default is to write to syslog.  We need to add a mechansim
for fetchmail to create a fetchmail_log_t and allow procmail_t to append
to it.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmv1JIACgkQrlYvE4MpobMVoQCbBguw0NgYBYr0X/6gfv5pqNXF
IUQAoNW3KmkesnPbo5CcPaUxCofKvPeR
=TiT3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Ok, I will add this mechanism to the policy.

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux