Re: Suitable type for DNSSEC private keys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Suitable type for DNSSEC private keys
From: "Göran Uddeborg" <goeran@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:55:04 +0100
Cc: fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1234906913.19376.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <18843.4607.479005.55936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <499B1754.5050309@xxxxxxxxxx> <1234901157.17336.92.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18843.9955.599102.732981@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1234906913.19376.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Stephen Smalley writes:
> Do you have to support dynamic updates or not?

No, at least not for now.

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

References:
- Suitable type for DNSSEC private keys
  - From: Göran Uddeborg
- Re: Suitable type for DNSSEC private keys
  - From: Daniel J Walsh
- Re: Suitable type for DNSSEC private keys
  - From: Stephen Smalley
- Re: Suitable type for DNSSEC private keys
  - From: Göran Uddeborg
- Re: Suitable type for DNSSEC private keys
  - From: Stephen Smalley

Prev by Date: Rawhide: SELinux is preventing dhclient-script (dhcpc_t) "getattr"
Next by Date: Re: Suitable type for DNSSEC private keys
Previous by thread: Re: Suitable type for DNSSEC private keys
Next by thread: Re: Suitable type for DNSSEC private keys
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Campsites] [KDE Users] [Gnome Users]

Powered by Linux