Re: Query regarding booleans

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 21:18 -0800, Deependra Singh Shekhawat wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
>
>
> I have written a selinux policy in fedora which actually have a
> boolean declared within the policy and when the boolean is on some
> allow rules are written which actually come into picture. But if the
> boolean is off the SELinux denial message doesn't suggest the user to
> actually switch on the boolean. I have seen in the normal case with
> the default booleans this is not the case and the denial actually
> suggest the user to switch on the boolean. I believe I need to do
> something more then what I am currently doing that's why I am asking
> here.
>
>
>
> Can you suggest me anything regarding this ?

If you feed the denial message to audit2why, does it suggest changing
the boolean?

--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency



Sorry for a late reply.

Yes it says to look for boolean settings but it doesn't mention any boolean name as such.

Thanks
--
Type bits /keyID    Date       User ID
pub  1024D/483B234C 2007/06/29 Deependra Singh Shekhawat (Fedora Project) <jeevanullas@xxxxxxxxx>
    Key fingerprint = ED45 62EA A4D7 53FB 44C7  774A D55B F3F0 483B 234C

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux