-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Dominick Grift wrote:
>> On second thought, no. I do not think spamd_t has access to
>> user_pyzor_home_t.
>>
>> sesearch --allow -s spamd_t | grep home | less
>>
>> so i guess your custom module fixes that. consider filing a bug report
>> for this issue.
>
> Thanks for your help. I have not yet altered my new local policy, but I
> thought I would try a reboot to see if that had any affect...
>
> Oh boy! A whole raft of denials...
>
> This is the audit2allow result of this recent batch. It seems quite a
> lot to me!
>
> require {
> type user_pyzor_home_t;
> type admin_home_t;
> type spamd_t;
> type procmail_t;
> class dir { read write add_name remove_name };
> class file { read create ioctl write getattr unlink append };
> }
>
> #============= procmail_t ==============
> init_stream_connect_script(procmail_t)
This looks like you have some process running as initrc_t that procmail
needs to talk to. If this is not a domain we have a confinement for
this is fine.
> #============= spamd_t ==============
> allow spamd_t admin_home_t:dir { read write add_name remove_name };
> allow spamd_t admin_home_t:file { write getattr read create unlink ioctl
> append };
This is spamd creating stuff in the /root directory. Not sure if you
want to actually allow this. Might want to setup the directory with
properly lableing to allow spamd to write there.
userdom_read_sysadm_home_content_files(spamd_t)
What directory?
You could setup labeling of
# semanage fcontext -a -t spamassassin_home_t '/root/.spamassassin(/.*)?'
#restorecon -R -v /root
> allow spamd_t user_pyzor_home_t:file { read getattr };
This should be allowed and should be reported as a bug.
>
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks again
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkmHQPQACgkQrlYvE4MpobNMJQCgpyjywU41sN4DwjNf/I4sDupD
ircAn3+wy3IwE5yPn0VPt8aIvQpK9+2U
=Wssl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
