On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Xavier Toth <txtoth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'll give it a try on an F10 box when it finishes building. > > Ted > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> I have sucked it up over the last couple of days and have cleaned up >> most of the MLS avcs in Fedora 11. It now boots up and I can log in in >> enforcing mode. >> >> I would prefer to work with the F11 policy, although this can safely be >> installed on an F10 system. >> >> Tryout 3.6.3-5.f11 >> >> I gave the kernel_t the privs to run plymouth, it does not make much >> sense to prevent kernel_t from any of the accesses it needed. >> >> Also wrote most of the policy for wm_t. >> >> Some problems like use of fusermount are going to be tougher to decide >> on what the right thing to do is. >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAkl3kf0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNMYwCeOHaZ3GokeMzg8oRrM8vU/S6Q >> sqAAoNlF+b4v0c3pnd7BPb8ljzwMB3Vj >> =WkHm >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > No can do on FC10 as it requires policycoreutils which requires python 2.6 ... :( Ted -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
