Re: init_script_type versus init_script_file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This doesn't solve my problem of building on FC9 though...

On Oct 27, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Carter wrote:
Good morning.

I'm trying to build a module package but I'm running into issues with
these macros. When I build in my FC9 development environment, I require
init_script_file. When I use mock, it will only build using
init_script_type. Why the difference, and what do I do about it?

While I might expect issues across versions, I don't expect a difference
when my mock target and my build environment are the same.

Also, if FC10 is different from FC9, how do I handle that?

TIA
- Dave

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
init_script_file is what you should use.  That is what upstream wants.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkGEZ0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNadgCgl2r7MXSlnl6JDSGjkGmAOF9d
qaIAoKWgRaDHkiGBuKphhPrpD53FBp6A
=QyPf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux