On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:31:09 +1000, James Morris said: > - Francis asked for a much-secure or safer workaround to the issue. > Given that the driver is messing with kernel security, is also broken in > its use of a security API, and not maintained, I'm certainly not going to > recommend its continued use in this context. Given the fact it's a kernel BUG, I wonder if the *real* issue isn't that the driver doesn't support SELinux, but that it doesn't understand the expanded more-than-32-bits capabilities in recent kernels, causing something to overlay something it shouldn't have...
Attachment:
pgpzFeuLFFz4Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
