-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Johnny Tan wrote: | Johnny Tan wrote: |> Paul Howarth wrote: |>>>>> It seems rsync_log_t is not defined. Can I somehow do this without |>>>>> having rsync_log_t? |>>>>> |>>>>> It works fine when I don't use a symlink, so I assume rsync_log_t |>>>>> is not necessary for this to work. |>>>>> |>>>>> But I need the symlink because I need the files to be stored in |>>>>> /var/log/store, as opposed to /opt/solr/logs. |>>>> I thought from earlier messages you were on RHEL 5? I've tested this |>>>> module with CentOS 5.2 and it loads just fine. |>>>> |>>>> Which policy version are you using? |>>> selinux-policy-2.4.6-106.el5_1.3 |>>> |>>> I haven't updated yet to 5.2 |>> |>> Try adding the type definition to the top of the policy module (just |>> after the "policy_module" line): |>> |>> type rsync_log_t; |>> logging_log_file(rsync_log_t) |> |> That still didn't recognize rsync_log_t. But I went ahead and upgraded |> to 5.2, and my original selinux policy works -- it doesn't use |> rsync_log_t at all. | | Question: | | Is it ok to update ONLY selinux-policy to the version that comes with | 5.2 (and library, etc., dependencies) WITHOUT upgrading the kernel and | everything else to their 5.2 versions? | Yes | johnn | | -- | fedora-selinux-list mailing list | fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx | https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkh0wjkACgkQrlYvE4MpobOMlgCgg4t9GiG/3YDOTliINaaOuXMa gxIAn079tVvoEgMLQXmK2fxMfckroMEZ =y1mH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
