On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 17:05 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The only problem I see with not having selinuxfs mounted at all within
> the chroot or even providing fake /selinux nodes is that rpm_execcon()
> will then see SELinux as disabled and thus not try to run the
> scriptlet in a different domain;
How does it do this check? Guess I should pull some rpm sources. My
lord I don't wanna....
> Anyway, I'd be interested in having Eric try the install with no
> selinuxfs mounted or fake selinux nodes within the chroot and see what
> happens, both in permissive mode and enforcing mode.
I've got my fake selinux mount inside the chroot much like I previously
described. /selinux/create is still getting long strings in it that
don't make much sense. I guess something is using it directly and not
through the libselinux interface?!?!
enforcing=1 /selinux inside the chroot is the little thing that I made
up to fake it.
Installing: selinux-policy ##################### [128/129]
Installing: selinux-policy-targeted ##################### [129/129]
libsemanage.dbase_llist_query: could not query record value
libsepol.sepol_user_modify: MLS is enabled, but no MLS default level was defined for user guest_u
libsepol.sepol_user_modify: could not load (null) into policy
libsemanage.dbase_policydb_modify: could not modify record value
libsemanage.semanage_base_merge_components: could not merge local modifications into policy
/usr/sbin/semanage: Could not add SELinux user guest_u
libsepol.sepol_user_modify: MLS is enabled, but no MLS default level was defined for user xguest_u
libsepol.sepol_user_modify: could not load (null) into policy
libsemanage.dbase_policydb_modify: could not modify record value
libsemanage.semanage_base_merge_components: could not merge local modifications into policy
/usr/sbin/semanage: Could not add SELinux user xguest_u
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on :1.3:/org/freedesktop/Hal/Manager: dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
/sbin/restorecon reset / context system_u:object_r:file_t:s0->system_u:object_r:root_t:s0
/sbin/restorecon reset /bin context unconfined_u:object_r:file_t:s0->system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0
/sbin/restorecon reset /bin/rvi context unconfined_u:object_r:file_t:s0->system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0
/sbin/restorecon reset /bin/touch context unconfined_u:object_r:file_t:s0->system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0
/sbin/restorecon reset /bin/mountpoint context unconfined_u:object_r:file_t:s0->system_u:object_r:mount_exec_t:s0
/sbin/restorecon reset /bin/arch context unconfined_u:object_r:file_t:s0->system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0
and restorecon goes on like this, and on, and on, and on, and on
other things of note, restorecond goes nuts fixing up /etc/mtab for a
while, must be some bad/no transition going on when we call mount?
I get no kernel AVC's but I do get:
[root@dhcp231-25 ~]# ausearch -m AVC -m USER_AVC
----
time->Mon May 12 17:19:48 2008
type=USER_AVC msg=audit(1210627188.083:329): user pid=1849 uid=81 auid=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='avc: denied { send_msg } for msgtype=method_return dest=:1.16 spid=2044 tpid=6840 scontext=system_u:system_r:hald_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_notrans_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=dbus : exe="/bin/dbus-daemon" (sauid=81, hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=?)'
----
time->Mon May 12 17:20:13 2008
type=USER_AVC msg=audit(1210627213.086:330): user pid=1849 uid=81 auid=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='avc: denied { send_msg } for msgtype=method_return dest=:1.16 spid=2044 tpid=6840 scontext=system_u:system_r:hald_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_notrans_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=dbus : exe="/bin/dbus-daemon" (sauid=81, hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=?)'
I've never seen unconfined_notrans_t until I started playing with this
stuff. Dan, what is it?
/me goes to try to build a livecd image with permissive and then with
no /selinux inside the chroot.
-Eric
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
