Re: SELinux smolt stats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:

> > where the percentage enabled is actually thus at least 74% ?
> 
> We probably need more detailed reporting for this sort of thing.  I'll
> put it on a TODO, for after FOSDEM.  I wanted to get this draft out,
> so we can decide what reporting we need on a more evolutionary basis.
> (Or by intelligent design if you hold by that sort of thing.)

Ok, can we simply get an answer on how the numbers are arrived at for 
cases prior to when SELinux reporting started?  i.e. if not reporting 
SELinux (F7 etc), is the default to present it on the site as "Disabled" ?

Knowing that, we can simply derive the correct value.

Also, could a note be added to that page so that people don't assume it is 
fully correct as stated ?

We've had enough problems historically with people adopting one benchmark 
result from a range of results as being the overall result, for example.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux