Posting to both lists because I'm not sure who's at fault here.... System is a Dell Latitude D820, x86_64 kernel, userspace is basically Fedora Rawhide as of earlier today, in particular selinux-policy-mls-3.2.5-12.fc9 Trying to boot a 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 kernel gets me these msgs: security: 5 users, 8 roles, 2043 types, 102 bools, 16 sens, 1024 cats security: 67 classes, 164754 rules security: class peer not defined in policy security: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy security: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy security: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy security: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy security: permission forward_in in class packet not found in policy, bad policy security: the definition of a class is incorrect 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 said this instead: security: class peer not defined in policy security: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy security: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy security: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy security: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy SELinux: policy loaded with handle_unknown=deny and then proceeded to work OK. (I suspect this may be the same thing Andrew Morton hit, but I can't be sure). Anybody got hints on how to move forward? Or is a fixed policy already in the Rawhide pipe?
Attachment:
pgpjmZ064g09C.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
