Wart wrote:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
piotreek wrote:
Hi guys i found some strange messages in my logs. It seams that
selinux is blocking a dhcp an Iptables.
I found similar post on group about DHCP but my messages are
different.I am using FC7 latest policy update didn't resolve the
problem.
P.S I am using firestater as my firewall.
I believe you will need to write custom policy to make this work.
You can simply add these rules using audit2allow.
# grep dhcpc /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mydhcpc
# semodule -i mydhcpc.pp
Having dhcpc allowed to turn on/off firewall rules is of debatable
security risk.
I'm noticing similar behavior with dhcp and ntp. It seems that for
some reason the dhcp client is trying to play with ntp (probably
because I define the ntp server in the dhcp server config) and failing:
type=AVC msg=audit(1184457984.239:75): avc: denied { remove_name }
for pid=6370 comm="rm" name="ntpd" dev=sdc1 ino=1632966
scontext=system_u:system_r:dhcpc_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_lock_t:s0 tclass=dir
type=AVC msg=audit(1184457984.239:75): avc: denied { unlink } for
pid=6370 comm="rm" name="ntpd" dev=sdc1 ino=1632966
scontext=system_u:system_r:dhcpc_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_lock_t:s0 tclass=file
type=AVC msg=audit(1184457984.253:76): avc: denied { add_name } for
pid=6377 comm="touch" name="ntpd"
scontext=system_u:system_r:dhcpc_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_lock_t:s0 tclass=dir
type=AVC msg=audit(1184457984.253:76): avc: denied { create } for
pid=6377 comm="touch" name="ntpd"
scontext=system_u:system_r:dhcpc_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_lock_t:s0 tclass=file
type=AVC msg=audit(1184457984.254:77): avc: denied { write } for
pid=6377 comm="touch" name="ntpd" dev=sdc1 ino=1632966
scontext=system_u:system_r:dhcpc_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_lock_t:s0 tclass=file
I can easily write a custom policy to allow this, but it feels like a
common enough configuration (ntp server configured by dhcp) that there
should be a global policy (or boolean?) to allow this to work.
--Mike
Did it work in enforcing mode? Currently the policy says to dontaudit
search of the locks directory, which should have prevented these avc
messages in enforcing mode. If it works in enforcing mode, these
avc's can be ignored.
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
