mothra wrote:
I'm rather green, and have had some trouble deciphering a lot of the
SELinux stuff. Any help would be great. I'm using procmail to filter
mail through spamassassin (SA), but SELinux appears to be interfering. I
say this because if I turn off enforcing, mail gets through properly
tagged by SA. With SELinux on, messages are not tagged by SA. The log
looks like this:
Jun 26 23:07:51 parsnip kernel: audit(1182917271.036:1779): enforcing=1
old_enforcing=0 auid=4294967295
Jun 26 23:07:51 parsnip dbus: avc: received setenforce notice (enforcing=1)
Jun 26 23:08:04 parsnip kernel: audit(1182917284.795:1780): avc: denied
{ search } for pid=28116 comm="spamassassin" name="tmp" dev=sda3
ino=26738689 scontext=user_u:system_r:procmail_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:tmp_t:s0 tclass=dir
My (rather ignorant) read is that procmail_t and tmp_t are not matching
(procmail does try to write a lockfile). And what I have gleaned is that
I either need some sort of rule that somehow matches these two, or I need
to change some tags (on my /tmp directory?) to allow this to proceed.
Am I anywhere near the ballpark? I tried audit2why to decipher this, but
it complained that it didn't understand policies outside of the range
15-20. Audit2allow returns
allow procmail_t tmp_t:di search;
But I'm not sure what to do with it...
Thanks in advance for any help!
- Lowell
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
What os/version are running? audit2why saying that it does noot
understand policy > 20 sounds like you have a partially upgraded system?
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
