J. Tang wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 10:06 +0800, Ken YANG wrote:
the build tools i use are:
automake-1.10-5
autoconf-2.61-8.fc7
make-3.81-6.fc7
Hello Ken.
I was able to reproduce your issue on a Rawhide system. The reason is
due to automake. Fedora Core 6 (which is what SETools was tested upon)
ships with automake 1.9; Rawhide has automake 1.10. This newer version
of automake now considers GNU make extensions to be fatal errors,
whereas previous versions of automake ignored them.
Quick Answer: From SVN checkout, do this as the first step:
$ autoreconf -Wno-portability -i
as i mentioned before, the 3.1 tags in svn also failed with this error
but the 3.1 version of fc7 can be built without any errors:
This is because the source RPM contains the distributed, post-automake
files. That is, it has the result of a 'make dist'.
thanks very much for your guiding.
apol had "segmentation fault" errors in analyzing "all base" policy,
i.e. all modules in "module.conf" are changed into "base"
There is a critical error in libsepol-2.0.2 that prevents SETools from
opening source policies. Unfortunately, recompiling SETools against
libsepol-2.0.3 is not sufficient; it also requires a fix that is only in
the development branch of SETools.
"setools@xxxxxxxxxx" is the mailing list of setools? if yes, i will send
Yes.
if i have some setools problems(maybe bugs) in future, where can i send?
i can not find "subscribe" of setools mailing list, but i find the
"Active Tickets" in setools wiki. actually, i don't know what this mean.
i find there are bug and feature.
if the setools mailing list is private, i will send problem/bug to the
fedora-selinux mailing list in future, ok?
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
