Dnia 10/29/2006 05:16 PM, Użytkownik Joshua Brindle napisał:
Modules do not allow genfscon statements, the grammar of modules is a subset of the base policy grammar.
Thanks for the clarification. I'll need to modify policy-selinux SRPM then.
However, is this filesystem slated for upstream kernel?
From what I read on upstream project page¹, it will be merged into ntfsprogs package. I don't know what will happen then with ntfs module included in kernel.
If so it should be added to refpolicy anyway, it would get the nfs_t type though, instead of dosfs_t
nfs_t? Well, in current policy ntfs filesystem type is marked as dosfs_t type so I don't see a reason to mark ntfs-3g in a different way. ntfs-3g is "just" a ntfs with write access² ;-) Regards, Dawid ¹ http://www.linux-ntfs.org/ ² http://wiki.linux-ntfs.org/doku.php?id=ntfs-3g -- ^_* -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
