Re: package review?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 12:25 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:
>>Paul Howarth wrote:
>>>Did you follow the guide on Packaging/SELinux on the wiki for actually
>>>building the module in your package? I've changed what I do for package
>>>building since I last updated that page (and I can't update it any more)
>>>and you'll find it won't build on rawhide as there is an
>>>selinux-policy-devel package you need as a buildreq there.
>>
>>Yes, I used policygentool to generate the policy files, then your
>>SELinux page to put it in the package.  I'd like to see an official
>>packaging policy for selinux modules for Fedora Extras, but I'm not sure
>>that there are many FE contributors looking at selinux yet.  It looks
>>like the page has also been copied to PackagingDrafts/SELinux, where you
>>should be able to modify it.
> 
> 
> Yes, Tibbs contacted me privately about that. I've have a go at updating
> it, probably next week.

If you want, I can make some updates to the SELinux page now that I've
got a working package for FC5 (no FC6 testing has been done yet).

--Mike

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux