Paul Howarth wrote: > On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 12:25 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote: >>Paul Howarth wrote: >>>Did you follow the guide on Packaging/SELinux on the wiki for actually >>>building the module in your package? I've changed what I do for package >>>building since I last updated that page (and I can't update it any more) >>>and you'll find it won't build on rawhide as there is an >>>selinux-policy-devel package you need as a buildreq there. >> >>Yes, I used policygentool to generate the policy files, then your >>SELinux page to put it in the package. I'd like to see an official >>packaging policy for selinux modules for Fedora Extras, but I'm not sure >>that there are many FE contributors looking at selinux yet. It looks >>like the page has also been copied to PackagingDrafts/SELinux, where you >>should be able to modify it. > > > Yes, Tibbs contacted me privately about that. I've have a go at updating > it, probably next week. If you want, I can make some updates to the SELinux page now that I've got a working package for FC5 (no FC6 testing has been done yet). --Mike
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list