> From: Paul Howarth [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx] <snip> > > Back to the point, my email a few times back suggested > putting a line > > with just ; where the rules would be in order to get a > module without > > rules, have you tried that? > > Is this with or without the requires clause? > > With the requires clause, the semicolon doesn't seem to make > any difference. Ok, now I'm not sure what is going on. I built a policy with no rules and it linked in fine. (no ; was required either).. The policy_module statement always brings in a ton of requires (object classes mainly) so you'll always have requires whether you add them explicitly or not. What problem are you running into with this? -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
