Re: selinux-policy-devel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Howarth wrote:
Perhaps the selinux-policy package should be split into an selinux-policy and selinux-policy-devel package, with the -devel package being needed for building new policy/modules, and the base policy package containing just the stuff needed for regular runtime usage?

I suggest this because I just tried building a policy module in mock with the new minimal environment and it fell over because building policy modules requires m4, which is not in the minimal environment. So m4 needs adding as a dep of selinux-policy (it's referenced from /usr/share/selinux/devel/include/Makefile), and this is really a devel-specific package that shouldn't be needed by most people, hence splitting off a -devel subpackage and adding the dep to that makes more sense. The -devel package could also have a dep on checkpolicy, which would be nice...

We have gone back and forth on this one. The original idea was to make it easier for people to build custom policy and not have to go looking for this package.
Paul.

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux