On Wed, 10 May 2006 10:53:16 +0300, Maxim Britov said: > On Tue, 09 May 2006 18:07:01 -0400 > Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > > > Am looking at selinux-policy-2.2.38-1.src.rpm. Does anybody know > > why there isn't a %build section in the .SPEC file? I was *hoping* > > to do a 'rpmbuild -bc' to assist in debugging an outstanding problem > > I'm having with strict policy, but apparently all the building gets > > done in the %install. Blech. > > Confirm. selinux-policy-strict-2.2.38-1 in fc5 updates is broken :( > > Updating : selinux-policy-strict ####################### [ 4/10] > libsepol.scope_copy_callback: authlogin: Duplicate declaration in module: typ e/attribute system_chkpwd_t > libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed > semodule: Failed! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188060 is already open for the system_chkpwd_t problem. I came across the specfile problem while trying to debug that problem. The interesting part is that Horst opened that bug against 2.2.29, I finally got fed up with rpm complaining and found the bugzilla - and nobody else has attached themselves to the cc: list. For a while, I was wondering if Horst and I were the only two trying to use the Rawhide 'strict' policy...
Attachment:
pgpnHwQTeixMJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
