Harry Hoffman wrote:
Hi,
I'm happy to setup /srv to be var_t for the time being.
Two questions:
1) if this isn't a ideal way of solving the problem is there a better way?
2) will whatever the solution become be merged into the policies that
RHAS/Fedora/Centos/etc. use?
Thanks,
Harry
This solution is already in Fedora and will be in RHEL and I suppose its
clones. The only change would be if we started to label srv as
something different. (srv_t)?
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list