Re: rawhide selinux-policy-strict whoopsage...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 12:31:08 EST, Stephen Smalley said:
> On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 12:18 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> > 18 assertions.  This looks fixable....
> 
> Yes, that is actually a bug in the copying of assertions during module
> linking - no real assertions failed.  Should be fixed in libsepol
> 1.11.11.

I snagged libsepol-1.11.12 and selinux-policy-strict-2.2.9-2 and now we have:

...
Attempting to install module 'xserver.pp':
Ok: return value of 0.
Attempting to install module 'zebra.pp':
Ok: return value of 0.
Committing changes:
libsepol.check_assertion_helper: assertion on line 0 violated by allow user_sudo_t user_sudo_t:process { setcurrent };
libsepol.check_assertion_helper: assertion on line 0 violated by allow staff_sudo_t staff_sudo_t:process { setcurrent };
libsepol.check_assertion_helper: assertion on line 0 violated by allow sysadm_sudo_t sysadm_sudo_t:process { setcurrent };
libsepol.check_assertions: 3 assertion violations occured
libsemanage.semanage_expand_sandbox: Expand module failed
semodule:  Failed!

Looks like 1 issue left in sudo.pp generating 3 asserts (the upgrade to
libsepol 1.11.12 cleared 18 others).  Haven't dug in yet whether this is
another manifestation of the same/similar bug, or an actual sudo.pp issue. (in
either case, "on line 0" is a busticated message...)

Attachment: pgpvyODJFoKQJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux