On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 22:11 +0000, Martin Ebourne wrote: > On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 10:28 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > amanda_t looks odd there. > > ls -Z /usr/sbin/smartctl > > # ls -Z /usr/sbin/smartctl > -rwxr-xr-x root root system_u:object_r:fsadm_exec_t /usr/sbin/smartctl > > > sudo selinux patch has been reverted in rawhide, possibly should be done > > in FC4 as well. bug 178429 > > Rebuilt FC4 sudo-1.6.8p8-2.4 without the two selinux patches: that's > fixed it thanks! I'm not using NOEXEC though. Further to this, I note that I don't even need the inetd_child_disable_trans boolean set now. By default nrpe running under xinetd is allowed to sudo. Should this not be controlled? What protection does running xinetd under selinux give? Cheers, Martin. -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list