On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Stephen Smalley wrote: > When I mentioned that the NFSv4 named attributes might not be suitable > for our purposes to the Trusted Solaris folks, they said that they > should be and that any lack there is one of the Linux implementation, > not the protocol definition or its intended implementation. This thread contains some discussion on the issue: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/current/msg02336.html IIRC, the consensus on the issue is to look at adding new OPs for Linux/BSD extended attributes. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
