On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 08:20 -0800, Tom London wrote: > There are reports in fedora-test about the 2.X policy slowing down > udev. (Appears that folks are comparing booting with selinxux=1 with > selinux=0). > > I have to admit that udev is running slower (targeted/enforcing). > > Any validity to this? Known issue? How to track down? libselinux 1.27.28 should help with this slowdown, and further improvement can be had by modifying udev to call matchpathcon_init_prefix() to limit processing to /dev entries. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
