On 11/8/05, Steve G <linux_4ever@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/2): audit-libs-1.0.12- 100% |=========================| 35 kB 00:00
(2/2): audit-1.0.12-1.fc4 100% |=========================| 170 kB 00:00
Running Transaction Test
/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts: Multiple same specifications for /sbin/lvm.static.
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Test Succeeded
Running Transaction
/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts: Multiple same specifications for /sbin/lvm.static.
Updating : audit-libs ######################### [1/4]
Updating : audit ######################### [2/4]
Cleanup : audit-libs ######################### [3/4]
Cleanup : audit ######################### [4/4]
Updated: audit.i386 0:1.0.12-1.fc4 audit-libs.i386 0:1.0.12-1.fc4
Complete!
$ rpm -qa *\selinux\*
libselinux-1.23.10-2
selinux-policy-targeted-1.27.1-2.13
libselinux-devel-1.23.10-2
The selinux-policy-targeted version if from updates-testing.
Should I file a bug on this or the libselinux packages?
Thank you,
>several times and I keep seeing this. Do I need to do some kind of restorcon?
This message comes straight out of libselinux when it sees a policy problem. This
bug should have been caught by when the policy was built in my opinion. You need
to update to a new policy to get rid of it.
-Steve
__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/2): audit-libs-1.0.12- 100% |=========================| 35 kB 00:00
(2/2): audit-1.0.12-1.fc4 100% |=========================| 170 kB 00:00
Running Transaction Test
/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts: Multiple same specifications for /sbin/lvm.static.
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Test Succeeded
Running Transaction
/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts: Multiple same specifications for /sbin/lvm.static.
Updating : audit-libs ######################### [1/4]
Updating : audit ######################### [2/4]
Cleanup : audit-libs ######################### [3/4]
Cleanup : audit ######################### [4/4]
Updated: audit.i386 0:1.0.12-1.fc4 audit-libs.i386 0:1.0.12-1.fc4
Complete!
$ rpm -qa *\selinux\*
libselinux-1.23.10-2
selinux-policy-targeted-1.27.1-2.13
libselinux-devel-1.23.10-2
The selinux-policy-targeted version if from updates-testing.
Should I file a bug on this or the libselinux packages?
Thank you,
-- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list