Stephen Smalley wrote:
The natural followup question is - why is security_context_t being used, instead of char* ?On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 14:24 +0000, Joe Orton wrote:Great, thanks. Is it OK to presume that security_context_t is always a char * and just print that string?Yes.
-- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
