On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 14:14 +0700, rhp wrote: > 18-oct-05 > > Hello Stephen: > > Thank's for the information, it certainly explained my problem. > > I've upgraded setools and the other elements in the selinux tree as > far as I can go on my FC3 system w/o installing glibc-2.3.90.14, (e.g. > the latest version of setools, requires 'lib.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)' which it > seems first appears in that version of glibc). You could alternatively just build the latest from source on your own system so that they don't pick up a dependency on the newer glibc, either grabbing the rawhide SRPMS or the upstream source tarballs (setools from tresys.com, the core SELinux userland from the sourceforge CVS tree). But if what you have is working, then you may not want to risk moving to the bleeding edge ;) > 'seinfo' is working so I hope the remainder or the tools are also and > that I can proceed with my persual of SELinux. > > BTW: 'rpmfind.net' lists glibc-2.3.90.14 as being part of the FC5 > tree, is that the tree you are presently working with for development > ? Yes, we are working off the development tree aka rawhide which will become FC5. The rough schedule is over at http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/ -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
