Tom Lisjac wrote:
We can't afford RHEL. If updating installed Fedoras is going to cause
them to become unstable after a new version release, we'll have no
choice but to migrate to another OS.
I backed out of the problematic policy update by getting the
source for the previous update, using rpmbuild to construct the
binary .rpm and using the --force option to return to the
earlier policy. If I can do it, you can do it. It was
inconvenient, but nothing compared to my peer Windoze
users' weekly struggles with the latest and greatest anti-virus
software.
dpn
--
Daniel Normolle, Ph.D.
Research Assistant Professor Senior Research Associate
Department of Radiation Oncology UMCCC Biostatistics Unit
Room 8D22 Voice: 734-764-2473
300 North Ingalls E-mail: monk@xxxxxxxxx
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0473 FAX: 734-936-9582
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~monk
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
