On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:31:10 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > That was the original approach during FC2 development, but was later > dropped. With multiple policies (strict, targeted, mls, ...), including > potential customization by end users, it became problematic. Oh, OK. When binary policy modules appear maybe it would be useful to do it again so third party RPMs can be a part of the SELinux world. At the moment the focus seems to be on totally centralised policy for everything the user might want to run (or be secured) ... I can't see this scaling as SELinux enters the mainstream. thanks -mike -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
