On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:05:02PM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > OK, so there is nothing the upstream maintainers can/have to do. > How should third party vendors package their RPMs to make sure they work > with SELinux, then ? Can we exclude /opt from the audits ? Filing bug-reports against the current policy is for sure good, if that has real problems in it. You can also check "pam_mount" from the newest Fedora Extras development tree to see a package that contains a selinux policy file. Not sure that is actually fully working, but at least that's the one rpm I know about doing this. greetings, Florian La Roche -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
