On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:36:51 EST, Colin Walters said: > My opinion is that it is essentially an inferior implementation of much > of the functionality SELinux provides. It does have some additional > features like the dynamic privilege elevation that seem possibly useful, > but I don't think it makes sense to use systrace just for that. I admit not having read the Systrace stuff yet. Are there any features that SELinux would benefit from implementing similar functionality?
Attachment:
pgp1V9ab9enj4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
