Re: Here is an interesting one

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard Irving wrote:
Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:

--- snmpd.te    2005-03-05 00:13:17.000000000 -0500
+++ snmpd.new   2005-03-05 00:13:46.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
<snip>
1.17 and 1.19.1 are the only two I can find....

Thank You, Ivan.

  I have synced my sources, added the changes, threw
in a few extras for a few other functions I chained in
on snmpd, as a litmus test...

  And it runs error, and log entry free.

  Once the audit, make, and install, reload.. all works well, this system
is -smooth-. But, I did still have to:

 "dontaudit snmpd_t unconfined_t:process signull;"

To keep from getting one of the scripts to not log.

 I'll chase that down later, as it is the -only- unconfined_t entry
that was involved, and it was a "signull".

  Once again, Thanks.






--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux