On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 11:50:27 EST, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx said: > I'm wondering if it would make more sense to push a patch upstream to the > kernel-utils crew. Reading the smartd manpage in more detail, it looks like > feeding it a '-M exec /usr/sbin/sendmail' (or building with that as the > default) would let us only have to add sendmail_exec_t rather than all those. Or that *would* work, if the smartd code didn't use popen() to actually run it, giving us a gratuitous '/bin/sh -c'. Looks like some fairly hefty reworking to make it do the whole pipe()/fork()/exec() thing itself. Blech. ;)
Attachment:
pgpBUuFdPDiYT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
