Re: ldconfig, /etc/ld.so.cache and prelink ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom London wrote:

Running strict/enforcing off of Rawhide.

While doing today's rawhide installs (yum),
I monitored the label of /etc/ld.so.cache via
   ls -lZ /etc/ld.so.cache

Several times during the installation of packages,
the label of this file changed from
system_u:object_r:ld_so_cache_t
to root:object_r:ld_so_cache_t [OK, I think]
or to
root:object_r:etc_t
[Not OK, I think]


Each time it changed to etc_t, I ran
   restorecon -vv /etc/ld.so.cache
a few seconds later and got the typical
    restorecon reset context /etc/ld.so.cache->system_u:object_r:ld_so_cache_t

I'm guessing that when a package updates
/etc/ld.so.cache, it may leave the label
in a funny state, presuming that yum
will fix it at the end.

Does this explain the 'intermittant' prelink
error messages generated during package installations?

tom


There is a bug in rpm that will be fixed after FC3 ships. Basically RPM sets the default context of any execed script to be rpm_script_t.
This works fine for most applications because the post install scripts run in a shell and process transitions work properly. The
problem is that in certain situations rpm exec ldconfig which also runs in rpm_script_t, as opposed to ldconfig_t. As such it does not
have the rules to create the ld_so_cache_t correctly. In order to fix this problem we have added a new library function to libselinux
rpm_exec. This function will take a command and figure out if it should run under a specific context (ldconfig_t) or just execute it under
rpm_exec_t.


Dan


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux