On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:17:30PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > >btw i didn't see an acknowledgement from the person who sent the > >last udev patch (dan was it you?) > > > >the use of the "mode" argument it is clear has not been used, > >to call i think it was matchpathcon. > > > >instead, because i had three near-identical code portions all > >of which had different S_IFXXX thingies, dan-i-think-it-was > >moved the near-identical code into a function with a "mode" > >argument... > > > >... and forgot to use the "mode" argument such that matchpathcon > >is called with S_IFDIR. > > > >given that i haven't seen an acknowledgement of this issue > >either in my inbox or on the mailing lists (which i am checking > >manually) i thought it best to hassle people until i know it's > >been spotted. > > > >this is IMPORTANT because it will impact the contexts on > >inodes and stuff created in /dev: the "optimising" argument > >"mode" passed to matchpathcon and setfscreatecon, if wrong, > >results in relevant (and correct!) file_context entries being > >skipped! > > > >l. > > > >On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:37:17PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > > > > > > > >>On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 04:29, Tom London <selinux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Newest Rawhide updates (including udev-030-10, mkinitrd-4.1.8-1, > >>>kernel-2.6.8-1.532, and selinux-policy-strict-1.17.5-2) > >>>now boots in strict/enforcing. > >>> > >>> > >>I've attached a diff against the CVS policy as well as the .te and .fc > >>files for udev changes which fix this and address some other issues as > >>well. > >> > >> > >-- > >fedora-selinux-list mailing list > >fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list > > > > > Yes it was me and I modified out udev rpm, but I guess I never > responded. Sorry about that. not a problem, just making sure. i have to manually check the fedora-selinux list: if you did i must have missed it. *whew*. l.
