Russell,
Understood. Let me dig into it.
tom
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* /From/: Russell Coker <russell coker com au>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 02:04, Stephen Smalley <sds epoch ncsc mil> wrote:
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 11:31, Tom London wrote:
> Latest Rawhide policy seems to 'reverse the labeling' of programs
> started from xinetd, like in.comsat, ... (strict/enforcing)
inetd.fc entries removed at Russell's request, as the inetd_child_t
domain wasn't sufficient anyway to allow those programs to run properly,
and labeling them inetd_child_exec_t merely masked the lack of proper
security domains for those programs and encouraged bleeding permissions
into inetd_child_t.
Some of those programs need to have policy written for them. Some need to be
re-written, reconfigured, or replaced. At least now they won't be forgotten.
Tom, if you would like to contribute policy for any of these...
