Greg KH wrote:
Who complained and why? When selinux support wasn't built in the functions were just stubs, how could that have possibly had any effect whatsoever on anyone else?Please fix that patch up to: - not have any ifdef in the .c files - use the proper coding style - use the same convention as the other build flags have.
Actually, what was wrong with the older selinux support in udev that was
there? Why not just dig that stuff up and see if it works or not (I bet
it does...) If so, I'll be glad to add it back in, it's just that too
many people complained about it when it was in there...
If you could, please paste a patch from the older version so that we can see here whether it should work right (it's possible that the libselinux api changed between then and now)
Joshua BrindleOh, and udev does not require a ramfs, or tmpfs at all, that's just how the distro decided to use it.
