/u?dev/microcode ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Fedora SELinux support list for users & developers." <fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: /u?dev/microcode ?
From: Tom London <selinux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:49:31 -0700
List-archive: </archives/fedora-selinux-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-selinux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Fedora SELinux support list for users & developers." <fedora-selinux-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-selinux-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list>, <mailto:fedora-selinux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list>, <mailto:fedora-selinux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: "Fedora SELinux support list for users & developers." <fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040502)

A previous posting indicated that /u?dev/microcode should be labeled as
system_u:object_r:cpu_device_t.

Is this still needed? Added to file_contexts/types.fc?

tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /u?dev/microcode ?
  - From: Russell Coker

Prev by Date: Re: typo in new fixifiles
Next by Date: Strict policy test, 1.13.7-1, denies: lvm.static, klogd, udev, httpd, xfs, xorg, dmesg
Previous by thread: typo in new fixifiles
Next by thread: Re: /u?dev/microcode ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Campsites] [KDE Users] [Gnome Users]

Powered by Linux