Re: [Fwd: Re: who provides /etc/sysconfig/selinux?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen Smalley wrote:

On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 10:53, Daniel J Walsh wrote:


Todays selinux-polcy-* RPMS attempt to handle the /etc/selinux/config and /etc/sysconfig/selinux files in the post install.

Please check them out.



Shouldn't it default to SELINUX=permissive in the absence of any /etc/sysconfig/selinux file?



No, Well the only way this should happen is on a fresh install or a disabled SELinux box. I don't like permissive because we end up with to many false AVC Messages. A fresh install should put down proper context and with targeted policy, enforcing should work out of the box. Also I have a concern about people forgetting to change permissive to enforcing, and having a false sence of security.

Do we need a dependency on the newer libselinux, policycoreutils, and
SysVinit that are aware of the new policy locations?



Probably. Any application that uses default contexts needs to use the new library.

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux